Comparative advertising is a marketing strategy in which a marketer's product is presented as equal to or superior when compared to a competitor's product. Comparative advertising often involves a side-by-side comparison of the two products.
Comparative advertising isn't used exclusively by big, Fortune 500 companies.
Internet startups often use comparative advertising blended with content marketing for successful "ninja” marketing campaigns. Consider the successful launch of Dollar Shave Club.
Probably the most famous comparative ad campaign is the
Bud Light campaign that appeared in the 2019 Super Bowl Ads.
Anheuser-Busch ran a commercial in which a large barrel of corn syrup is mistakenly delivered to the Bud Light castle. Because Bud Light doesn’t use corn syrup, the Bud Light King and a rag-tag group of knights delivered the barrel of corn syrup to the Coors Light castle, where a guard acknowledges that their beer is brewed with corn syrup.
Coors immediately filed a lawsuit under the Lanham Act, alleging that the commercial, and a series of other related ads, were misleading. The case was ultimately decided in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, with a ruling in Anheuser-Busch's favor.
The takeaway: before you start sneering at your competitors too much, consider the cost of defending an expensive lawsuit. Done right, comparative advertising is favored by the FTC because it provides meaningful information to consumers. Done wrong, comparative advertising can get you sued by an enraged competitor that may have significantly greater resources.